Hill v. Evatt
Hill v. Evatt
Opinion
30 F.3d 129
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charlton Lefate HILL, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Parker EVATT, State of South Carolina, Department of
Corrections Commissioner; Benjamin Montgomery,
Warden; William Fender, Physician,
Defendants Appellees.
No. 93-7161.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: June 23, 1994.
Decided: July 14, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-2058-1-10-A)
Charlton Lefate Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Vinton DeVane Lide, Lide, Montgomery & Potts, P.C., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Evatt, No. CA-92-2058-1-10-A (D.S.C. Sept. 24, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.