U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

United States v. Shahram Shirkhani

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 14, 1994

30 F.3d 132; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 26762; 1994 WL 363400 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

30 F.3d 132

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Shahram SHIRKHANI, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-7283.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted June 23, 1994.
Decided July 14, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CR-91-133, CA-93-470)

Shahram Shirkhani, appellant pro se.

N. George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN and WILKINS, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit.* Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Shirkhani, Nos. CR-91-133; CA-93-470 (E.D. Va. Nov. 9, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel. See Whisenant v. Yuam, 739 F.2d 160 (4th Cir. 1984)

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.