Richard Authur Cashman v. C. O. Barnes Larry W. Huffman Lisa M. Jones David K. Smith
Richard Authur Cashman v. C. O. Barnes Larry W. Huffman Lisa M. Jones David K. Smith
Opinion
32 F.3d 562
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Richard Authur CASHMAN, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
C. O. BARNES; Larry W. Huffman; Lisa M. Jones; David K.
Smith, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6521.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 19, 1994
Decided: August 15, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-92-211-R)
Richard Authur Cashman, Appellant Pro Se.
Donald G. Powers, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Verona, Virginia; Steven Paul Roadcap, Department of Social Services, Verona, Virginia; Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cashman v. Barnes, No. CA-92-211-R (W.D.Va. Mar. 31, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.