U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Jessie R. Winfield v. R. Boyers J. H. Lyle Jack Lee

Jessie R. Winfield v. R. Boyers J. H. Lyle Jack Lee
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided July 28, 1994
32 F.3d 563; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 28847; 1994 WL 392313 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Jessie R. Winfield v. R. Boyers J. H. Lyle Jack Lee

Opinion

32 F.3d 563
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Jessie R. WINFIELD, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
R. BOYERS; J. H. Lyle; Jack Lee, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6089.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 19, 1994
Decided: July 28, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-92-733-R)

Jessie R. Winfield, Appellant Pro Se.

Alan Katz, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, PHILLIPS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Winfield v. Boyers, No. CA-92-733-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 20, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.