U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Eric Samuels v. William E. Reed, Iii, Police Officer, Charleston County Police Department

Eric Samuels v. William E. Reed, Iii, Police Officer, Charleston County Police Department
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 8, 1994
32 F.3d 563; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 28849; 1994 WL 411278 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Eric Samuels v. William E. Reed, Iii, Police Officer, Charleston County Police Department

Opinion

32 F.3d 563

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Eric SAMUELS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
William E. REED, III, Police Officer, Charleston County
Police Department, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-6324.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1994
Decided Aug. 8, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. Charles E. Simons, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-93-1129-2-6-BC)

Eric Samuels, Appellant Pro Se.

James Albert Stuckey, Jr., Stuckey & Kobrovsky, Charleston, SC, for appellee.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Samuels v. Reed, No. CA-93-1129-2-6-BC (D.S.C. Mar. 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.