U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Eddie Hatcher Roderick D. Hooker Paul Pollock v. Wilford Shields Sid Harkleroad Franklin E. Freeman, Jr.

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 16, 1994

33 F.3d 51; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30186; 1994 WL 440392 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

33 F.3d 51

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Eddie HATCHER; Roderick D. Hooker; Paul Pollock,
Plaintiffs Appellants,
v.
Wilford SHIELDS; Sid Harkleroad; Franklin E. Freeman, Jr.,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6599.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 19, 1994
Decided: August 16, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. James C. Fox, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-259-5-F)

Eddie Hatcher, Roderick D. Hooker, Paul Pollock, Appellants Pro Se.

E.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hatcher v. Shields, No. CA-94-259-5-F (E.D.N.C. May 5, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.