U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Francis Russell Holley v. Sewall B. Smith William Filbert Robert Bond, Classification Pamela Sorensen

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 16, 1994

33 F.3d 51; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30187; 1994 WL 440435 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

33 F.3d 51

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Francis Russell HOLLEY, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Sewall B. SMITH; William Filbert; Robert Bond,
Classification; Pamela Sorensen, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6634.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1944.
Decided August 16, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-800-HAR)

Francis Russell Holley, appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Richard M. Kastendieck, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holley v. Smith, No. CA-94-800-HAR (D. Md. May 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.