U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Ray Harland Grant v. Sheriff Boswell R. E. Rhodes Deputy Gregory Captain Herbert

Ray Harland Grant v. Sheriff Boswell R. E. Rhodes Deputy Gregory Captain Herbert
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 10, 1994
33 F.3d 51; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30175; 1994 WL 416284 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Ray Harland Grant v. Sheriff Boswell R. E. Rhodes Deputy Gregory Captain Herbert

Opinion

33 F.3d 51

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ray Harland GRANT, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Sheriff BOSWELL; R. E. Rhodes; Deputy Gregory; Captain
Herbert, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6388.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted July 19, 1994.
Decided August 10, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CA-93-10)

Ray Harland Grant, appellant Pro Se.

John Adrian Gibney, Jr., Sarah Jane Chittom, Shuford, Rubin & Gibney, Richmond, VA, for appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Grant v. Boswell, No. CA-93-10 (E.D. Va. Mar. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.