U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

James Harold Sumiel v. Edward W. Murray

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided August 16, 1994

33 F.3d 52; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 30206; 1994 WL 440440 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

33 F.3d 52

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Harold SUMIEL, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Edward W. MURRAY, Defendant Appellee.

No. 94-6631.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: July 19, 1994
Decided: August 16, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-826)

James Harold Sumiel, Appellant Pro Se.

Martha Murphey Parrish, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Sumiel v. Murray, No. CA-93-826 (E.D. Va. May 10, 1994; April 20, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.