Leo Rites, and Rocky Hines Roosevelt Brandon Robert White William Jamison Rick Bailey Michael Sewell v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr. William L. Smith
Leo Rites, and Rocky Hines Roosevelt Brandon Robert White William Jamison Rick Bailey Michael Sewell v. Richard A. Lanham, Sr. William L. Smith
Opinion
35 F.3d 556
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Leo RITES, Plaintiff Appellant,
and
Rocky HINES; Roosevelt Brandon; Robert White; William
Jamison; Rick Bailey; Michael Sewell, Plaintiffs,
v.
Richard A. LANHAM, Sr.; William L. Smith, Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6693.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted July 19, 1994.
Decided August 18, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey II, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-1429-H).
Leo Rites, Appellant Pro Se.
D.Md.
DISMISSED.
Before HALL, LUTTIG, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals the district court's order denying Appellant's request for a temporary restraining order. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.