U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Jerry Nathan Deal v. S. R. Witkowski, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution Dwayne Monroe, Sergeant, Perry Correctional Institution

Jerry Nathan Deal v. S. R. Witkowski, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution Dwayne Monroe, Sergeant, Perry Correctional Institution
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 28, 1994
36 F.3d 1092; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33934; 1994 WL 525172 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Jerry Nathan Deal v. S. R. Witkowski, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution Dwayne Monroe, Sergeant, Perry Correctional Institution

Opinion

36 F.3d 1092

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jerry Nathan DEAL, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
S. R. WITKOWSKI, Warden, Perry Correctional Institution;
Dwayne Monroe, Sergeant, Perry Correctional
Institution, Defendants Appellees.

No. 92-7097.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 2, 1993.
Decided Sept. 28, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-90-1293-6-3K)

Jerry Nathan Deal, appellant pro se.

Russell W. Harter, Jr., Charles Michael Groves, Chapman, Harter & Groves, P.A., Greenville, SC, for appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, Circuit Judge, and PHILLIPS and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Deal v. Witkowski, No. CA-90-1293-6-3K (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.