U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Garnell Steven Hill, Sr. v. Gary Hornbaker, Assistant Warden John Boteler, Security Chief Jessie James, Captain, 7 to 3 Shift

Garnell Steven Hill, Sr. v. Gary Hornbaker, Assistant Warden John Boteler, Security Chief Jessie James, Captain, 7 to 3 Shift
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 23, 1994
36 F.3d 1092; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33928; 1994 WL 521051 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Garnell Steven Hill, Sr. v. Gary Hornbaker, Assistant Warden John Boteler, Security Chief Jessie James, Captain, 7 to 3 Shift

Opinion

36 F.3d 1092

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Garnell Steven HILL, Sr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Gary HORNBAKER, Assistant Warden; John Boteler, Security
Chief; Jessie James, Captain, 7 to 3 shift,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6125.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: May 17, 1994
Decided: September 23, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-93-2236)

Garnell Steven Hill, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.

John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Richard M. Kastendieck, Office of the Attorney General of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before MURNAGHAN, NIEMEYER, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hill v. Hornbaker, No. CA-93-2236 (D. Md. Dec. 30, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.