U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Eugene R. Parsons v. T. Lawhorn Lieutenant Massie Jack Lee A. Santiago

Eugene R. Parsons v. T. Lawhorn Lieutenant Massie Jack Lee A. Santiago
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided September 23, 1994
36 F.3d 1093; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 33963; 1994 WL 521064 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Eugene R. Parsons v. T. Lawhorn Lieutenant Massie Jack Lee A. Santiago

Opinion

36 F.3d 1093

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Eugene R. PARSONS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
T. LAWHORN; Lieutenant Massie; Jack Lee; A. Santiago,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6418.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: June 7, 1994
Decided: September 23, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-93-343-R)

Eugene R. Parsons, Appellant Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before WILKINS and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Parsons v. Lawhorn, No. CA-93-343-R (W.D.Va. Mar. 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.