Robert Lewis Albright v. Warden of Mecklenburg
Robert Lewis Albright v. Warden of Mecklenburg
Opinion
37 F.3d 1492
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Robert Lewis ALBRIGHT, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
WARDEN OF MECKLENBURG, Respondent Appellee.
No. 93-6911.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: July 6, 1994.
Decided: Oct. 12, 1994.
Robert Lewis Albright, appellant Pro Se. Linwood Theodore Wells, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for appellee.
W.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before WIDENER, HALL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Albright v. Warden of Mecklenburg, No. CA-92-5-R (W.D.Va. Aug. 3, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.