Tommy McElveen v. Cameron M. Currie, Deputy Attorney General
Tommy McElveen v. Cameron M. Currie, Deputy Attorney General
Opinion
37 F.3d 1494
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Tommy McELVEEN, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Cameron M. CURRIE, Deputy Attorney General, Defendant Appellee.
No. 93-7212.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Sept. 20, 1994.
Decided: Oct. 12, 1994.
Tommy McElveen, appellant Pro Se. William Henry Davidson, II, Ellis, Lawhorne, Davidson, Sims, Morrison & Sojourner, P.A., Columbia, SC; Edwin Eugene Evans, Senior Assistant Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for appellee.
D.S.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. McElveen v. Currie, No. CA-92-2010-21AJ (D.S.C. Oct. 20, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Status
- Published