Torry S. Tellefsen, and Sandra K. Boozer v. Sylvia Flack Alice E. Johnson Carol Boles Cathy Canzona Winston-Salem State University

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit October 17, 1994

Torry S. Tellefsen, and Sandra K. Boozer v. Sylvia Flack Alice E. Johnson Carol Boles Cathy Canzona Winston-Salem State University, 37 F.3d 1495 (4th Cir. 1994)

1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 34889; 1994 WL 564723

Opinion

37 F.3d 1495
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Torry S. TELLEFSEN, Plaintiff Appellant,
and
Sandra K. Boozer, Plaintiff,
v.
Sylvia FLACK; Alice E. Johnson; Carol Boles; Cathy
Canzona; Winston-Salem State University,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-1464.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 26, 1994.
Decided Oct. 17, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. Norwood Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-91-301-6)

Torry S. Tellefsen, Appellant Pro Se.

Thomas Oregon Lawton, III, Associate Attorney General, Thomas J. Ziko, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

M.D.N.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tellefsen v. Flack, No. CA-91-301-6 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Reference

Status: Published