Harold L. Rainey v. E. B. Wright, Jr. Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia
Harold L. Rainey v. E. B. Wright, Jr. Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia
Opinion
37 F.3d 1495
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Harold L. RAINEY, Petitioner Appellant,
v.
E. B. Wright, Jr.; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, Respondents Appellees.
No. 94-6496.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Aug. 30, 1994
Decided: Oct. 19, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-92-935)
Harold L. Rainey, Appellant Pro Se. Thomas Cauthorne Daniel, Assistant Attorney General, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Rainey v. Wright, No. CA-92-935 (W.D.Va. Mar. 24, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.