David Lee Prince, Jr. v. James Truslow, Corporal
David Lee Prince, Jr. v. James Truslow, Corporal
Opinion
40 F.3d 1244
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
David Lee PRINCE, Jr., Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
James TRUSLOW, Corporal, Defendant Appellee.
No. 94-6844.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Sept. 26, 1994.
Decided Nov. 3, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Chief District Judge. (CA-94-688).
David Lee Prince, Jr., appellant Pro Se.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Prince v. Truslow, No. CA-94-688 (E.D. Va. July 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.