U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

United States v. Rudolph Lane, A/K/A Bay Boy

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 3, 1994

40 F.3d 1245; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 38665; 1994 WL 620808 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

40 F.3d 1245

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Rudolph LANE, a/k/a Bay Boy, Defendant Appellant.

No. 94-6546.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 26, 1994.
Decided Nov. 3, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Rebecca B. Smith, District Judge. (CR-92-88-N, CA-93-1159-2).

Rudolph Lane, appellant Pro Se. Charles Dee Griffith, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his post-judgment motion for reconsideration of the denial of his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses no abuse of discretion and that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v. Lane, No. CR-92-88-N; No. CA-93-1159-2 (E.D. Va. Apr. 25, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.