U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Charles Alexander Clark v. Prison Health Services, Incorporated William Meadows, and Balbosa, Pharmacy Technician Roberts, Pharmacy Technician

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided November 16, 1994

43 F.3d 1465; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 39994; 1994 WL 645325 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

43 F.3d 1465

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles Alexander CLARK, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
PRISON HEALTH SERVICES, INCORPORATED; William Meadows,
Defendants Appellees,
and
BALBOSA, Pharmacy Technician; Roberts, Pharmacy Technician,
Defendants.

No. 93-7148.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Sept. 26, 1994.
Decided Nov. 16, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. William M. Nickerson, District Judge. (CA-93-1543-WN)

Charles Alexander Clark, appellant pro se.

Joseph Barry Chazen, Meyers, Billingsley, Shipley, Rodbell & Rosenbaum, Riverdale, MD, for appellees.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WILKINSON and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Clark v. Prison Health Services, No. CA-93-1543-WN (D. Md. Oct. 7, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.