U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Ronald Avon Johnson v. Sandra A. O'connor, State Attorney for Baltimore County Ronald E. Moats, Acting Warden Roxbury Correctional Institute

Ronald Avon Johnson v. Sandra A. O'connor, State Attorney for Baltimore County Ronald E. Moats, Acting Warden Roxbury Correctional Institute
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 16, 1994
43 F.3d 1466; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40033; 1994 WL 702336 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Ronald Avon Johnson v. Sandra A. O'connor, State Attorney for Baltimore County Ronald E. Moats, Acting Warden Roxbury Correctional Institute

Opinion

43 F.3d 1466

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Ronald Avon JOHNSON, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Sandra A. O'CONNOR, State Attorney for Baltimore County;
Ronald E. Moats, Acting Warden Roxbury
Correctional Institute, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6895.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted November 17, 1994.
Decided December 16, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, Senior District Judge. (CA-93-3972-HAR)

Ronald Avon Johnson, appellant pro se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Stephanie Judith Lane-Weber, Asst. Atty. Gen., Baltimore, MD, for appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM

1

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R.App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.