Haburn v. Oakley
Haburn v. Oakley
Opinion
43 F.3d 1466
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James D. HABURN, Sr., Plaintiff Appellant,
and
Dennis O. Blackwell, Plaintiff,
v.
Dennis OAKLEY; James B. Hunt, Governor; Franklin E.
Freeman, Jr.; Mr. Hoy, Case Manager; Raeford Mitchell,
lieutenant; David Stewart, Johnston County; Sergeant
Hayes; Belinda Long; Mr. Hoy; Willis Adcock; E. L.
Woodard, Defendants Appellees,
and
Marvin Sparrow, Defendant.
No. 94-7069.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Nov. 17, 1994.
Decided: Dec. 19, 1994.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-93-727-5-CRT-H)
James D. Haburn, Sr., Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
DISMISSED.
Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order dismissing one of his numerous claims filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988). We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.
We dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.