U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1994

Prechtl v. Mills

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided December 13, 1994

43 F.3d 1467; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 40052; 1994 WL 697418 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

43 F.3d 1467

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Bartholomew PRECHTL, III, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
John MILLS, Inmate Relations Coordinator; Phoebe Wilson,
Inmate Relations Coordinator; Stanley R. Witkowski, Warden;
Wayne Chastine, Investigator, each of the Perry
Correctional Institution and each in their official and
individual capacities, Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6697.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Nov. 17, 1994
Decided Dec. 13, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Anderson. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-92-1996-8-17AJ)

William Bartholomew Prechtl, III, Appellant Pro Se. Jack Martin Telle, DOYLE & O'ROURKE, Anderson, SC, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

AFFIRMED.

Before RUSSELL and MURNAGHAN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Prechtl v. Mills, No. CA-92-1996-8-17AJ (D.S.C. May 27, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.