U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Franklin E. Dennison v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

Franklin E. Dennison v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided January 19, 1995
46 F.3d 1123; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6765; 1995 WL 19258 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Franklin E. Dennison v. State of South Carolina T. Travis Medlock, Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

Opinion

46 F.3d 1123

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Franklin E. DENNISON, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA; T. Travis Medlock, Attorney
General of the State of South Carolina,
Respondents--Appellees.

No. 94-7211.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 13, 1994.
Decided Jan. 19, 1995.

Franklin E. Dennison, appellant pro se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Atty. Gen., Columbia, SC, for appellees.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals the magistrate judge's denial of Appellant's motion to show cause. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because the order is not appealable. This Court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1291 (1988), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. Sec. 1292 (1988); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541 (1949). The order here appealed is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order.

2

We deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal as interlocutory. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.