Anthony L. Davis v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. Gary T. Dixon Deborah Adles

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Anthony L. Davis v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. Gary T. Dixon Deborah Adles, 46 F.3d 1123 (4th Cir. 1995)
1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 6757; 1995 WL 10217

Anthony L. Davis v. Franklin E. Freeman, Jr. Gary T. Dixon Deborah Adles

Opinion

46 F.3d 1123

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Anthony L. DAVIS, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Franklin E. FREEMAN, Jr.; Gary T. Dixon; Deborah Adles,
Defendants Appellees.

No. 94-6805.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: December 13, 1994
Decided: January 12, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, District Judge. (CA-93-121)

Anthony L. Davis, Appellant Pro Se. Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, NC, for Appellees.

E.D.N.C.

DISMISSED.

Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R.App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore dismiss the appeal.* We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

*

We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel

Reference

Status
Unpublished