Tucker v. Johnson
Tucker v. Johnson
Opinion
46 F.3d 1126
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Cornelius TUCKER, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Correctional Officer JOHNSON; Assistant Warden Lee; J. B.
French, Warden; Lieutenant Signal; Lynn C. Phillips;
Correctional Officer Brown; Correctional Officer Thomas;
Lieutenant Walker; Lieutenant Munn, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94-7250.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 13, 1994.
Decided Jan. 19, 1995.
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying leave to file a complaint pursuant to a pre-filing injunction. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Tucker v. Johnson, No. CA-94-125 (E.D.N.C. Oct. 28, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Cornelius Tucker, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Johnson Assistant Warden Lee J. B. French, Warden Lieutenant Signal Lynn C. Phillips Correctional Officer Brown Correctional Officer Thomas Lieutenant Walker Lieutenant Munn
- Status
- Unpublished