Venable v. Wright
Venable v. Wright
Opinion
46 F.3d 1129
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
James Eugene VENABLE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
E. B. WRIGHT, Warden; Bass, Superintendent/ Warden;
Webster, Medical Department; Mr. Underwood,
Medical Department; Johnson, The Food
Service, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94-7216.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 13, 1994.
Decided Jan. 19, 1995.
James Eugene Venable, appellant pro se.
Pamela Anne Sargent, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.
Before WIDENER and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Venable v. Wright, No. CA-93-620 (E.D. Va. Sept. 30, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
We also deny Appellant's motion for transfer to another prison
Reference
- Full Case Name
- James Eugene Venable v. E. B. Wright, Warden Bass, Superintendent/ Warden Webster, Medical Department Mr. Underwood, Medical Department Johnson, the Food Service
- Status
- Unpublished