Edward L. Holley v. Karen Fleetwood Sergeant Bonner
Edward L. Holley v. Karen Fleetwood Sergeant Bonner
Opinion
47 F.3d 1165
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Edward L. HOLLEY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Karen FLEETWOOD; Sergeant Bonner, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94-6927.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 3, 1995.
Decided March 1, 1995.
Edward L. Holley, Appellant Pro Se. William Thomas Culpepper, III, Edenton, North Carolina; Samuel Bobbitt Dixon, WHITE, HALL & DIXON, Elizabeth City, NC, for Appellees.
Before HALL, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Holley v. Fleetwood, No. CA-91-668 (E.D.N.C. July 25, 1994). We deny Appellant's motion for oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*
AFFIRMED.
Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel is denied as moot
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.