U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Alton B. Smith v. George N. Martin, Iii, Warden Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

Alton B. Smith v. George N. Martin, Iii, Warden Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 14, 1995
47 F.3d 1165; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 10829; 1995 WL 58695 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Alton B. Smith v. George N. Martin, Iii, Warden Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

Opinion

47 F.3d 1165

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Alton B. SMITH, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
George N. MARTIN, III, Warden; Attorney General of the
State of South Carolina, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 94-6858.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 19, 1995.
Decided Feb. 14, 1995.

Alton B. Smith, Appellant Pro Se. Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Smith v. Martin, No. CA-93-3165-3-19AK (D.S.C. July 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

We also grant Petitioner's motion to amend his informal brief and have considered arguments raised therein

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.