Harris v. Larson
Harris v. Larson
Opinion
48 F.3d 1216
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Gary Lee HARRIS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
C. D. LARSON; R. A. Young; L. W. Huffman; D. A.
Garraghty; D. K. Smith; K. L. Osborn; F. Mardavich; E.
B. Walker; Officer Robertson; J. W. Law, Officer;
Lieutenant Hicks; E. C. Morris; Faye Johnson; P. Soles;
J. Berry, Sergeant, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94-7190.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 19, 1995.
Decided Feb. 16, 1995.
Gary Lee Harris, appellant Pro Se. Pamela Anne Sargent, Asst. Atty. Gen., Richmond, VA, for appellees.
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Harris v. Larson, No. CA-92-453-AM (E.D. Va. Oct. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.