Ruffin v. State of Md.
Ruffin v. State of Md.
Opinion
48 F.3d 1217
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Paul J. RUFFIN, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
STATE of Maryland; Mario W. FRANCIOLI; Vernon L. SIMMS;
John BORZ; Richard GLOBUS; George ROSE,
Defendants--Appellees,
and
Joel JACOBSON; Elizabeth TRUMBLE; Dennis W. CARROLL, Defendants.
No. 94-1884.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: February 16, 1995
Decided: March 2, 1995
Paul J. Ruffin, Appellant Pro Se. Lawrence Paul Fletcher-Hill, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ruffin v. State of Maryland, No. CA-93-1625-H (D. Md. June 13, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.