United States v. Melvin Lee Sharp
United States v. Melvin Lee Sharp
Opinion
48 F.3d 1218
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Melvin Lee SHARP, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 94-6722.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 6, 1995.
Melvin Lee Sharp, Appellant pro se.
Paul Arthur Billups, Assistant United States Attorney, Huntington, WV, for Appellee.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Sharp, Nos. CR-90-255; CA-93-634-3 (S.D.W. Va. May 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.