U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Samuel L. Retherford v. Ronald J. Angelone

Samuel L. Retherford v. Ronald J. Angelone
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 20, 1995
50 F.3d 7; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11427; 1995 WL 115743 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Samuel L. Retherford v. Ronald J. Angelone

Opinion

50 F.3d 7

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Samuel L. RETHERFORD, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Ronald J. ANGELONE, Respondent-Appellee.

No. 94-7345.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided Mar. 20, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (CA-94-966-R)

Samuel L. Retherford, appellant pro se.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Retherford v. Angelone, No. CA-94-966-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 15, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.