Allen Linwood Pinkett v. Steve Williams, Warden Hdorchester County Commissioner
Allen Linwood Pinkett v. Steve Williams, Warden Hdorchester County Commissioner
Opinion
50 F.3d 7
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Allen Linwood PINKETT, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Steve WILLIAMS, Warden; hDorchester County Commissioner,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94-7344.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Jan. 19, 1995.
Decided: Feb. 21, 1995.
Allen Linwood Pinkett, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Karp, ALLEN, JOHNSON, ALEXANDER & KARP, Baltimore, Md, for appellees.
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
Allen Linwood Pinkett, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel Karp, ALLEN, JOHNSON, ALEXANDER & KARP, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellees.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pinkett v. Williams, Nos. CA 94-2076-S; CA-94-2768-S (D. Md. Oct. 24, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.