Pritchard v. Harris
Pritchard v. Harris
Opinion
50 F.3d 7
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jesse James PRITCHARD, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Correctional Officer HARRIS; Sergeant LEA; G. M. HINKLE;
C. E. THOMPSON; L. M. SAUNDERS; S. F. TAYLOR; Jack LEE;
C. E. BYERS, Sergeant; Vicky WOODS; Macie MILLARD; Jane
DOES 1-10; John DOES 1-10; VDOC EMPLOYEES, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94-7407.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 19, 1995.
Decided Feb. 22, 1995.
Jesse James Pritchard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Pritchard v. Harris, No. CA-94-674-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 22, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.