U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Bufford Carroll Mullins v. Eddie Barnes Peggy Stout, Bristol City Jail Kitchen Supervisor Michael Salyer, Bristol City Jail Medical Supervisor

Bufford Carroll Mullins v. Eddie Barnes Peggy Stout, Bristol City Jail Kitchen Supervisor Michael Salyer, Bristol City Jail Medical Supervisor
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 21, 1995
50 F.3d 7; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11405; 1995 WL 118207 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Bufford Carroll Mullins v. Eddie Barnes Peggy Stout, Bristol City Jail Kitchen Supervisor Michael Salyer, Bristol City Jail Medical Supervisor

Opinion

50 F.3d 7

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Bufford Carroll MULLINS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Eddie BARNES; Peggy Stout, Bristol City Jail Kitchen
Supervisor; Michael Salyer, Bristol City Jail
Medical Supervisor, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-7399.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided March 21, 1995.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. James C. Turk, District Judge. (CA-92-831-R)

Bufford Carroll Mullins, appellant pro se.

Robert Vincent Ward, Michael Alan Bishop, Bristol, VA, for appellees.

W.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Mullins v. Barnes, No. CA-92-831-R (W.D.Va. Dec. 3, 1993; Oct. 11, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.