U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Glenn M. Timms v. S. R. Witkowski State of South Carolina Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

Glenn M. Timms v. S. R. Witkowski State of South Carolina Attorney General of the State of South Carolina
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided March 21, 1995
50 F.3d 8; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11437; 1995 WL 118232 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Glenn M. Timms v. S. R. Witkowski State of South Carolina Attorney General of the State of South Carolina

Opinion

50 F.3d 8

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Glenn M. TIMMS, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
S. R. WITKOWSKI; State of South Carolina; Attorney General
of the State of South Carolina, Respondents--Appellees.

No. 94-7366.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995
Decided March 21, 1995

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., District Judge. (CA-91-854-3-0BC)

Glenn M. Timms, Appellant Pro Se.

Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for Appellees.

D.S.C.

DISMISSED.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant noted this appeal outside the thirty-day appeal period established by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(1), failed to obtain an extension of the appeal period within the additional thirty-day period provided by Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(5), and is not entitled to relief under Fed. R.App. P. 4(a)(6). The time periods established by Fed. R.App. P. 4 are "mandatory and jurisdictional." Browder v. Director, Dep't of Corrections, 434 U.S. 257, 264 (1978) (quoting United States v. Robinson, 361 U.S. 220, 229 (1960)). Appellant's failure to note a timely appeal or obtain an extension of the appeal period deprives this Court of jurisdiction to consider this case. We therefore deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

DISMISSED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.