Eugene Thomas v. P. L. Huffman Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia
Eugene Thomas v. P. L. Huffman Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia
Opinion
50 F.3d 8
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Eugene THOMAS, Petitioner--Appellant,
v.
P. L. HUFFMAN; Attorney General of the Commonwealth of
Virginia, Respondents--Appellees.
No. 94-7372.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 16, 1995
Decided March 21, 1995
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Chief District Judge. (CA-93-980)
Eugene Thomas, Appellant Pro Se.
Katherine P. Baldwin, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.
W.D.Va.
DISMISSED.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Thomas v. Huffman, No. CA-93-980 (W.D.Va. Oct. 26, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.*
DISMISSED.
We deny Appellant's motion for appointment of counsel
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.