U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

United States v. Herbert Lee Johnson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided February 22, 1995

50 F.3d 8; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 11460; 1995 WL 123808 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Opinion

50 F.3d 8

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff--Appellee,
v.
Herbert Lee JOHNSON, Defendant--Appellant.

No. 94-7382.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Jan. 19, 1995.
Decided Feb. 22, 1995.

Herbert Lee Johnson, Appellant Pro Se. Robert William Jaspen, Office of the United States Attorney, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 (1988) motion. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Johnson, Nos. CR-90-113-R; CA-94-366 (E.D. Va. Nov. 14, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.