Jeffrey M. Thurman v. Bishop L. Robinson Richard Lanham Sewall Smith Eugene Nuth Carol Jackson David Dixion
Jeffrey M. Thurman v. Bishop L. Robinson Richard Lanham Sewall Smith Eugene Nuth Carol Jackson David Dixion
Opinion
50 F.3d 8
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Jeffrey M. THURMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
BISHOP L. ROBINSON; Richard Lanham; Sewall Smith; Eugene
Nuth; Carol Jackson; David Dixion, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-7455.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: Feb. 16, 1995.
Decided: March 21, 1995.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. M.J. Garbis, District Judge. (CA-94-3076)
Jeffrey M. Thurman, Appellant Pro Se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Thurman v. Robinson, No. CA-94-3076 (D. Md. Nov. 18, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.