Phillip Reynolds King v. Ann Emery, and Randell E. Lee
Phillip Reynolds King v. Ann Emery, and Randell E. Lee
Opinion
51 F.3d 266
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Phillip Reynolds KING, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ann EMERY, Defendant-Appellee,
and
Randell E. LEE, Defendant.
No. 94-7334.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 15, 1995.
Decided April 4, 1995.
Phillip Reynolds King, appellant pro se. William McBlief, North Carolina Department of Justice, Raleigh, NC, for appellee.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. King v. Lee, No. CA-93-175-5-CRT-B (E.D.N.C. Aug. 30, 1993; Oct. 11, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.