Kevin Ferguson v. Ralph Lamb Bill Coffey Larry D. Smith John Blackwood Mark Batson
Kevin Ferguson v. Ralph Lamb Bill Coffey Larry D. Smith John Blackwood Mark Batson
Opinion
51 F.3d 266
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kevin FERGUSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ralph LAMB; Bill Coffey; Larry D. Smith; John Blackwood;
Mark Batson, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-6338.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 15, 1995.
Decided March 29, 1995.
Kevin Ferguson, appellant pro se. W. Howard Boyd, Jr., Edwin Pruitt Martin, Jr., Gibbes & Clarkson, P.A., Greenville, SC, for appellees.
Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Ferguson v. Lamb, No. CA-92-839-7-18BD (D.S.C. Feb. 22, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.