U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Rayford L. Burke v. Michael Grant Howard Brown Ken Shawver Robert Warsaw Ralph Bently

Rayford L. Burke v. Michael Grant Howard Brown Ken Shawver Robert Warsaw Ralph Bently
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 20, 1995
52 F.3d 320; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17204; 1995 WL 231831 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Rayford L. Burke v. Michael Grant Howard Brown Ken Shawver Robert Warsaw Ralph Bently

Opinion

52 F.3d 320
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Rayford L. BURKE, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Michael GRANT; Howard Brown; Ken Shawver; Robert Warsaw;
Ralph Bently, Defendants--Appellees.

No. 94-7236.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted March 15, 1995.
Decided April 20, 1995.

Rayford L. Burke, Appellant Pro Se.

Edmund L. Gaines, HOMESLEY, JONES, GAINES & FIELDS, Statesville, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Burke v. Grant, No. CA-92-39-5-V (W.D.N.C. Oct. 6, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.