U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, 1995

Clifton Footes, Jr. v. William L. Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland

Clifton Footes, Jr. v. William L. Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Decided April 12, 1995
52 F.3d 321; 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 17571; 1995 WL 215448 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Clifton Footes, Jr. v. William L. Smith, Warden Attorney General of the State of Maryland

Opinion

52 F.3d 321
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Clifton FOOTES, Jr., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
William L. SMITH, Warden; Attorney General of The State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 95-6147.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: March 15, 1995.
Decided: April 12, 1995.

Clifton Footes, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. John Joseph Curran, Jr., Attorney General, Mary Ellen Barbera, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, MD, for Appellees.

Before RUSSELL and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Footes v. Smith, No. CA-93-3925-JFM (D. Md. Jan. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

2

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.