Meadows v. Kennett
Meadows v. Kennett
Opinion
53 F.3d 328
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Willard R. MEADOWS, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
John H. KENNETT, Jr., Attorney; Mosby G. Perrow, III,
Judge; Roscoe Bolan Stephenson, Jr., Justice;
Henry H. Whiting, Justice; Leroy
Roundtree Hassell, Justice,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-2555.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 10, 1995.
Willard R. Meadows, Appellant Pro Se. John H. Kennett, Jr., Roanoke, VA; Barbara J. Gaden, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Meadows v. Kennett, No. CA-94-100-R (W.D.Va. Nov. 7, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process. The motion to dismiss the appeal is denied.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.