Curry v. Allen
Curry v. Allen
Opinion
53 F.3d 328
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Charles Thomas CURRY, Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
David W. ALLEN, P.F.C., individually, and in his official
capacity; Jeff A. Saunders, P.F.C., individually, and in
his official capacity; David Poston, P.T.L., individually,
and in his official capacity; John Glenn, Chief of the
Burlington Police Department; City of BURLINGTON, North
Carolina, Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94-2539.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 10, 1995.
Charles Thomas Curry, Appellant Pro Se. Allan R. Gitter, WOMBLE, CARLYLE, SANDRIDGE & RICE, Winston-Salem, NC, for Appellees.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.* Curry v. Allen, No. CA-93-597-2 (M.D.N.C. Nov. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
We deny Appellees' motion to dismiss the appeal on the ground that Appellant's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis was untimely
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.