Luke Cutina Cooper v. B.C. Plageman
Luke Cutina Cooper v. B.C. Plageman
Opinion
54 F.3d 772
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Luke Cutina COOPER, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
B.C. PLAGEMAN, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 94-7373.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 18, 1995.
Luke Cutina Cooper, Appellant Pro Se. Mary Elizabeth Shea, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF VIRGINIA, Richmond, VA, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Cooper v. Plageman, No. CA-94-272 (W.D.Va. Nov. 16, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.