Kenneth Lee Clyde v. Waffle House Owner
Kenneth Lee Clyde v. Waffle House Owner
Opinion
54 F.3d 772
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Kenneth Lee CLYDE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
WAFFLE HOUSE OWNER, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-1158.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: April 20, 1995.
Decided: May 19, 1995.
Kenneth Lee Clyde, Appellant Pro Se.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Clyde v. Waffle House Owner, No. CA-94-891-5-H (E.D.N.C. Dec. 9, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.