John Taylor Bowles v. Attorney General of the State of Maryland, and Robert McDonald Caroline George
John Taylor Bowles v. Attorney General of the State of Maryland, and Robert McDonald Caroline George
Opinion
54 F.3d 772
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
John Taylor BOWLES, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
ATTORNEY GENERAL of the State of Maryland, Respondent-Appellee,
and
Robert McDONALD; Caroline George, Respondents.
No. 94-7020.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 17, 1995.
John Taylor Bowles, Appellant Pro Se. Valerie Johnston Smith, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MARYLAND, Diane Elizabeth Keller, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, MD, for Appellee.
Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Bowles v. McDonald, No. CA-91-1468-N (D.Md. Aug. 2, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.