Byron Hoch, Jr. v. Superintendent Keyser Officer Loydd Sergeant Cutters
Byron Hoch, Jr. v. Superintendent Keyser Officer Loydd Sergeant Cutters
Opinion
54 F.3d 773
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
Byron HOCH, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Superintendent KEYSER; Officer Loydd; Sergeant Cutters,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-7330.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Feb. 28, 1995.
Decided May 22, 1995.
Byron Hoch, Jr., appellant pro se. Mark Ralph Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellees.
Before NIEMEYER and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hoch v. Keyser, No. CA-94-169 (W.D.Va. Nov. 1, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.